0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹¾îÆÇ ¿µ¼ºÃøÁ¤µµ±¸(SAS)ÀÇ ½Å·Úµµ¿Í Ÿ´çµµ °ËÁõ¿¬±¸

Spiritual Assessment Scale : Psychometric Evaluation ofthe Korean Version

Á¾¾ç°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2001³â 1±Ç 2È£ p.168 ~ 179
KMID : 1137220010010020168
¿Àº¹ÀÚ ( Oh Pok-Ja ) - »ïÀ°´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

ÀüÈñ¼÷ ( Chun Hee-Sook ) - ¼­¿ïÀ§»ýº´¿ø
¼Ò¿Ü¼÷ ( So Woi-Sook ) - »ïÀ°°£È£º¸°Ç´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Spirituality has been found as a factor that may influence an individual¡¯s health and response to illness and dying. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Howden¡¯s Spiritual Assessment Scale(SAS). The SAS was developed based on the attributes of spirituality and constructed with 28 items, 4 subscales. The translation involved four steps : translation into Korean, checking agreement, back translation into English, and arriving at a consensus. Psychometric evaluation was done on 222 nurses from five hospitals. All responses were voluntary and anonymous. The Cronbach¡¯s alpa coefficient for internal consistency was .928 for the total 28 items and .700.805 for subdimensions. Item- total correlations ranged from .36.68. Principal Component Factor Analysis with Varimax Rotation yielded four factors with four or more items each loading at .40 or higher. These factors explained 51.3% of the total variance. The items clustered in this study were almost identical with initial scale. There was positive correlation(r=.648, p=.0001) between SAS and Ellison & Paloutzian¡¯s Spiritual Wellbeing Scale and negative correlation(r=-.418, p=.000) with Pines¡¯ Burnout Scale which indicate convergent and discriminant validity. In conclusion, this tool can be effectively utilized for assessing spirituality in Korea.
KeyWords
¿µ¼ºÃøÁ¤µµ±¸
Spirituality, Korean Version
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed